AML & KYC Readiness Review
Focused assessment of customer onboarding, screening, escalation, and file completeness for fintechs facing AML program scrutiny.
View engagementFintech compliance audits · Taiwan
North Harbor Compliance Studio reviews how payment firms, lenders, and remittance operators actually run AML, KYC, and complaints controls — then returns a findings memo your directors can use.
Fieldwork in Kinmen and across Taiwan — sampling files, not staging dashboards.
Flagship engagement
For fintech teams preparing for licensing reviews, banking diligence, or an internal board challenge. We test whether stated procedures match customer files, escalation logs, and ownership maps — then grade residual risk in plain language.
What you leave with
A board-ready summary, evidence gaps called by name, and a remediation order that respects how small compliance teams actually work.
We do not sell software, retainers disguised as “platforms,” or generic maturity scores. The deliverable is fieldwork you can defend.
Related engagements
Choose a narrower review when your pressure point is onboarding quality, examination prep, or a partner questionnaire.
Focused assessment of customer onboarding, screening, escalation, and file completeness for fintechs facing AML program scrutiny.
View engagementPre-examination walkthroughs that organize evidence, rehearsal questions, and ownership maps for fintech licensing or renewal reviews.
View engagementIndependent packaging of control evidence for banking partners, investors, or acquiring institutions reviewing a fintech’s compliance posture.
View engagementFrom the field
“Their control audit caught that our complaints log was updated weekly while our policy claimed same-day logging.”
Mei-Ling Hsu · Head of Compliance, regional remittance firm
Client stories stay specific: file quality, binder structure, and diligence answers that refuse to over-promise. Read the longer notes on our client stories page.
Read client storiesField notes
Before they open a transaction log, most examiners want to know who owns escalation decisions and how quickly those decisions are recorded.
A practical way to choose file samples that reveal real onboarding risk instead of producing an unmanageable spreadsheet exercise.